How silly. Mabye he has a CRUSH on her? I would NOT risk haveing him around, b/c the HUSBAND would get jeleaous.
I did NOT win my motion on the pleeding’s yesterday. The plaintiffs’ counsel said there was “a MATERIAL issue as to the fact’s and requested an evideintieary hearing. What was wierd is that he also served my PI with a subpeena duces tecum askeing HIM to bring with him to the hearing all information he has in his posesion showing the date of acruel of the injury. My PI has NEVER been subpeenied before and he is NOT anxious to testify here.
But I also think these are NOT the PIs record’s to bring! That is a fatal flaw I say. I say they are hearsay from the PI and MUST be subpeenied from the plainetiff’s employer, if at ALL! The manageing partner agrees, so I will have to make a motion to squash the subpeenieing of these records from the PI. It is all before the same judge and he like’s me so I should win. Yay!!!
What does the hive think? Is there any lawyer’s who do litiegiation that have some precedent on this motion for me?
When the PI went to the employer, it was the employer showed him HIS time cards showeing that the plainetiff was OUT with this suposed injury over 3 years 2 month’s and 10 day’s ago. That was beyond the statue of limitation. So I said those records were NOT the PI’s but the employers’ and they could NOT be subpeenied from the PI but they have to get it under the business record’s exception from the employer under the CPLR. I have to get cases on this, b/c the judge does not like to do his own research. FOOEY! I have to do so much work to win! FOOEY!
- I am glad to see that the Queen of Boundary-Free Workplaces has weighed in on this situation.
- Subpeenied!!